As it's a mere five years since the last new A Level maths specifications came out the QCA are clearly in dire need of updating their syllabus. Accordingly they're now in the consultation stage for a new curriculum to begin in 2012. This means of course that uncompleted A Levels will come to the end of their shelf-life at this time. Hopefully that won't affect me. But I was interested to see some of their recommendations.
1) They want to abolish the non-calculator paper. I think C1 is great. You learn how to do a lot of manipulation of formulae and a lot of arithmetic in your head. Differentiation, integration, surds, quadratics (factorising) can all be easily done without recourse to a calculator. This, surely is good for fast, flexible thinking and for confidence. The down side is that it does mean C1 can't be that challenging - you can't really put radians into it for example, even though conceptually radians is a piece of the proverbial. The same goes for basic trig. Trig would be better introduced in C1 rather than stuffed into C2 (which is I think around 35-40% trig, all told).
2) They are trying to bring it down to four modules again. This is not a bad idea. The current A Level maths six unit system is complicated and contradictory, though it is flexible for people with different specialisms. It also throws up anomalies. For example as it currently stands maths is the only A Level where you can do 4 AS modules and two A2 ones - which I am doing, because in addition to C1,C2,C3 and C4 I took S1 for AS and am doing M1 for A2. M1 is an AS module. So I'm only doing C3 and C4 as actual A2 Levels. The situation can be reversed - Pure Maths AS is two AS modules and one Further! And you can also do AS modules in Further Maths (you could do FP1-4 and S1 if you hadn't done it). This leads to anomalies in the awarding of grades - the A* grade is only awarded on the basis of C3 and C4.
Four modules would simply take us back to where we started in the 90s with the equivalent of P1 and P2 - ie the four Core modules collapsed into two again. This is probably where this idea dovetails with the abolition of the calculator paper.
3) There are going to be no formulae to learn. This strikes me as disastrous. It makes an expecation of zero knowledge on the part of candidates - and this is an advanced qualification we are talking aobut here. The authorities do not view knowledge as important, but expect candidates to problem solve. Well you can only solve problems if you know how to approach them - which strategies you know of to use. I think the motivation for this is clear dumbing down, or as the QCA write, to "provide students with equality of opportunity and a common basis for progression.". Hmmm. An advanced qualification should be for people who are advanced in their knowledge and understanding of that subject - it should not pander to political ideas of equality, and believe me the QCA does just that. In the questionnaire I answered yesterday I was asked whether the new specifications promote gender and race diversity, or whether they were discriminatory against disabled people. For crying out loud, why is even pure knowledge infected with this leftist rot?
4) They want slightly to change the balance between pure and applied. This probably isn't a bad idea. Right now applied is 33% of AS and A2, but they would like it to be more flexible, up to 40%. With fewer papers I don't know how they will do this, except by weighting, although the QCA do suggest that they might allow certain exams to be longer - this would be an excellent idea. At the same time they think the pure content should be kept the same. So without changing weightings or lengths of exams or indeed mixing up applied content into pure modules, I'm not sure how this will work.
5)There is a lot of guff on the QCA site about being more stretching. They conceive it as using longer, less structured questions. This is clearly an excellent idea, where possible and where practicable. I don't know if they just mean in Further or in Core maths as well.
You can go and look all this up for yourself at the QCA website.
Saturday 23 May 2009
Long Time, No Blog
It's been a tricky old year so far, like a particularly knotty equation, so I haven't found the time for maths blogging, or even for maths.
So it was with some trepidation that I looked at my calendar about a month ago and saw the date for the AQA C2 exam. At that point I knew nothing of radians, logarithms I couldn't even spell, and geometric series I thought were just lots of pretty pictures (lots of geometry type stuff). So I spent a month fairly hectically doing the last four chapters of C2, missing out a few questions on the way and also, disappointingly, not really bothering to look at the proofs for the various formulae but just learning them.
C2 was yesterday. It was ok, though exams are always hard to assess until you get the marks. I answered all qs, but I think the differentiation with fractional indices one might have cost me a few %.
As before, the exam was thrilling. No I really mean this. I had bags of adrenalin, lots of excitement, masses of determination to show what I could do. I am like this with things that don't matter. Only important things have me quivering in the corner like a wobbly jelly who's just been made professor of wobbling at Oxford (ok ok that's a Blackadder joke sort of). Lining up beforehand with fifty sixth formers all pointing at me and whispering was a bit strange but it just reminded me of how utterly uninterested in it I was at their age. You do it for reasons, to get to uni, or because you happen to be good it, but you rarely do it just because you love it - you learn that later. Sometimes.
So it was with some trepidation that I looked at my calendar about a month ago and saw the date for the AQA C2 exam. At that point I knew nothing of radians, logarithms I couldn't even spell, and geometric series I thought were just lots of pretty pictures (lots of geometry type stuff). So I spent a month fairly hectically doing the last four chapters of C2, missing out a few questions on the way and also, disappointingly, not really bothering to look at the proofs for the various formulae but just learning them.
C2 was yesterday. It was ok, though exams are always hard to assess until you get the marks. I answered all qs, but I think the differentiation with fractional indices one might have cost me a few %.
As before, the exam was thrilling. No I really mean this. I had bags of adrenalin, lots of excitement, masses of determination to show what I could do. I am like this with things that don't matter. Only important things have me quivering in the corner like a wobbly jelly who's just been made professor of wobbling at Oxford (ok ok that's a Blackadder joke sort of). Lining up beforehand with fifty sixth formers all pointing at me and whispering was a bit strange but it just reminded me of how utterly uninterested in it I was at their age. You do it for reasons, to get to uni, or because you happen to be good it, but you rarely do it just because you love it - you learn that later. Sometimes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
